Jasper Dark Sky Festival

Product Review: iOptron SkyGuider Tracking Mount

We test a new portable tracking mount.

Merrick-Gamma Cyg

HIS FIRST IMAGE: Greg Merrick has wanted to get into astro-imaging for years. On his first attempt, he polar-aligned the SkyGuider and tried a two-minute exposure of the Gamma Cygni Nebula at ISO 1600 with a modified Canon 60D and a 135mm lens at f/2. The result was the above image, with minimal Photoshop contrast and colour work. (The crescent nebula visible at lower left was an unintended bonus.) Photo by Greg Merrick

Today’s digital SLR cameras are able to capture astonishing celestial images. All they need is a small equatorial mount to compensate for the Earth’s rotation and keep tracking the stars. The camera then images the stars as pleasing points of starlight rather than nonstellar hyphens. Tracking allows more than just an aesthetic touch. It also brings several distinct advances to your personal astrophotographic repertoire.

To avoid star trailing on nontracked tripod-mounted images, photographers are limited to wide-angle lenses (typically, 28mm or shorter) and exposures under 25 seconds. Tracking mounts open imaging opportunities to lenses up to 200mm focal length, which greatly widens the choice of celestial targets. Equally important, exposures can be increased from seconds to several minutes. And, if desired, sequential tracked images of the same object can be digitally stacked for increased density and reduced digital noise.

In the era of film-emulsion photography, tracked astrophotography was more difficult for a multitude of reasons. I won’t list the frustrations, but there were many, which was probably the main reason that very few commercial portable tracking mounts specifically designed for SLR cameras were ever marketed.

Tracking Mounts Emerge

SkyGuider in use

READY TO GO TO WORK The SkyGuider is a solid mount that does what it is intended to do: provide an accurate, portable platform for astro-imaging with a modern DSLR camera. Some accessories are required, depending on individual preference. Most important among them is the ball head seen here between the camera and the mount.

That changed about a decade ago, and today, several are available. Three recent ones have been reviewed in SkyNews (Vixen Polarie, July/Aug. 2012; iOptron SkyTracker, May/June 2013; Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer, Nov./Dec. 2014). The iOptron SkyGuider shown here was supplied by iOptron for review. At a glance, it appears like a scaled down equatorial mount, but unlike most mounts, this size is designed expressly for travel astrophotography. To try it, I took it with me on a trip to the Enchanted Skies Star Party in southern New Mexico in late September. As seen above, the SkyGuider is being readied for action as darkness falls. For airline transport, everything disassembles and fit easily into my full-sized checked bag, with plenty of room for clothing and other astro gear. The semidesert conditions about an hour south of Socorro, New Mexico, proved to be ideal for astro-imaging.

Some essential accessories that are not part of the standard SkyGuider package are the iOptron ball head, between the camera and the mount, and the 12-volt holder (for eight AA batteries) on the tripod leg. There are many ball heads that will do the job, but the iOptron ball head is as good as any I have used. The important thing is to get one that is beefier than you might think it needs to be because it has to rigidly hold the camera and lens at an angle during the exposure — sometimes a steep angle. As for the 12-volt power source, several choices are detailed in the instructions. I paid a visit to my local hobby store, where the owner quickly found a five-dollar plastic holder that houses eight AA batteries, which you can see taped to the tripod leg. This added insignificant weight and powered the mount for five three-hour sessions, and it was still offering juice.

Using the Skyguider

Merrick and SkyGuider

On a knoll at a star party in New Mexico last autumn, Canadian amateur astronomer Greg Merrick sets up the iOptron SkyGuider, seen here atop the optional iOptron 44-inch tripod. In his hand is a photo-interval timer, a desirable accessory.

I have some advice for anyone getting into astro-imaging or upgrading to better imaging equipment. If you don’t already know an astrophotographer, find an astronomy-gear dealer with a staff member who’s actually taken celestial images with a DSLR during the past few years. Astro-imaging is, in many ways, a hobby within a hobby. Viewing and imaging have overlaps, but imaging has its own learning curve. Going deeper, there are DSLR imagers and CCD imagers with their own overlaps. It helps to have someone who has done it successfully to explain some of the equipment. Your local astronomy club may have just such an individual.

I’m not trying to scare anyone away. I’m simply suggesting that finding the right dealer can be a wise investment of your time. Here’s another tip directly relating to the SkyGuider, which I thoroughly enjoyed using. The sturdy but teensy tripod supplied with our review unit (28 inches high where it clamps to the mount) requires the user to kneel way down to sight the reticle in the polar-alignment scope and to adjust the knobs to get Polaris in the exact cor­rect spot. As a septuagenarian, I found the crawl­ing and crouching somewhat demand­ing. Fortunately, a 44-inch iOptron tripod I use with another scope solved my problem. This tripod can be purchased with the SkyGuider mount.

Dickinson - Andromeda Galaxy

IMAGING ANDROMEDA High overhead after midnight in New Mexico skies last fall, our big neighbour galaxy was an ideal target for the SkyGuider. This image is a digital stack of four exposures, ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 minutes, at ISO 800 on a modified Canon 6D with a Canon 135mm lens at f/2.0. Photoshop CS6 was used for stacking and processing. Our tests produced perfect tracking up to five minutes with the same lens. This mount would be adequate for any modern DSLR camera for almost any practical combination of lens (up to 135mm) and ISO setting. photo by Terence Dickinson

So what’s the verdict? Is it worth investing about $500 for the mount alone and
another $150 for the taller tripod? I say yes for several reasons: (a) I proved to my satisfaction that this mount reliably does what a portable astro-camera tracker is supposed to do; (b) the whole kit fits in a full-sized airline suitcase; and (c) the entire SkyGuider outfit costs less than the lens I used to take the Andromeda image above. This is a quality product that works.

What about the auto-guiding capability? Although there is an ST-4-compatible guiding port, I didn’t need it. To my mind, the advantage of the SkyGuider is its simplicity and accuracy: quick setup and alignment, no electronics, small batteries and accurate gears. For remote imaging anywhere, this is the formula. Simple, mechanical, largely foolproof. Colleagues who make a living as photographers in the news business say again and again that the best equipment to get the shot is reliable “no excuses gear” that won’t let you down.

Categories: Equipment Reviews
3 comments on “Product Review: iOptron SkyGuider Tracking Mount
  1. Sean Dunne says:

    Hi Terence,
    While your review was informative, it did not do any type of comparison with other alternatives for achieving the same objective. More importantly I found your use of the term DSLR really dates you. The digital single lens reflex is well on its way to dodo-land. DILCs (digital interchangeable lens cameras) or MILCs (mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras) are moving into the forefront and will completely displace DSLRs in the next 5 years if not sooner. Also you have not to my knowledge considered the super zooms for astro photography such as the Nikon P900.
    Sean Dunne
    Peterborough Astronomical Association.

    • Gary says:

      Hi Sean:

      The technology for obtaining stunning photos of the night sky has never been better, and that might be a good topic for a future article. Your speculations about the future of cameras may/may not prove correct, but in the here and now, of the many, many submissions SkyNews receives, something close to 85% are taken with DSLR cameras. That’s not surprising in light of the fact that DSLRs still outsell mirrorless cameras 3:1. The rumours of the DSLR’s death (popular though they have been for several years now), remain greatly exaggerated.


  2. Sean Dunne says:

    The comments sent above represent my own views and are not intended to represent an official position by the Peterborough Astronomical Association.

    Sean Dunne.

iOptron SkyGuider Pro
Send Celestron your eclipse footage
Lennox and Addington County Dark Sky Area
Give the Gift of SkyNews